When I begin a new advisory engagement with a CRE developer, operator, or mixed-use destination brand, the first thing I do before any strategy work, before any recommendations, before any agency conversations is audit what exists. Not the marketing spend. Not the agency roster. The fundamentals.
I've done this enough times to know that the answer to "why is our marketing underperforming?" is almost always visible in the first few conversations and the first few documents I review. The gaps are consistent across organizations. And the questions that reveal them are the same ones I ask every time.
I'm sharing them here because I believe most CRE organizations can run this diagnostic themselves. The questions are not complicated. The answers are often uncomfortable. But knowing the truth about where your marketing is is the prerequisite for knowing where to take it.
"The question I ask every new client is the same: if you stopped all your marketing spend tomorrow, what would keep working? The answer tells me everything about whether the marketing is building something or just renting attention."
The Six-Area CMO Audit
These are the six areas I examine in sequence. In each area, there are two or three questions that cut to the core of what is working and what isn't. Run through each honestly. The patterns will be apparent.
What the Patterns Tell You
Most organizations running this audit honestly will find the same three or four gaps appearing across multiple areas. A brand strategy that was never documented showing up as inconsistency in the brand-foundation questions, in the channel coherence questions, and in the agency alignment questions. An owned audience deficit showing up in the owned audience questions and in the business connection questions. A leadership gap showing up in the accountability questions and in the channel coherence questions.
The gaps cluster. And they cluster around the same root causes: a brand strategy that lives in someone's head rather than a document, marketing that measures activity rather than outcomes, and a marketing function that operates separately from the business decisions it should be informing.
Most marketing problems are not execution problems. They are architecture problems. The teams are working hard in the wrong direction because no one built the system that points them the right way.
If you run through these questions and find that the gaps are concentrated in the brand strategy foundation and the business connection areas, that is a strategic leadership problem that requires strategic leadership to solve. More execution will not close it. If the gaps are concentrated in channel coherence and vendor alignment, those are execution problems that a capable marketing manager or agency review can address. Knowing which kind of problem you have determines what kind of help you need. And the most common mistake CRE organizations make is hiring execution capacity when what they actually need is strategic architecture.
If you run this audit and want to talk through what you find, LH Strategic Advisory would be glad to help interpret the results and identify the highest-leverage next steps. Reach out at leslie@lhstrategicadvisory.com.
The most consistent finding is that marketing activity and business outcomes are measured in separate conversations and are not connected strategically. Teams are producing content, running campaigns, and managing social channels without a clear line to leasing velocity, foot traffic, or tenant sales. This is almost always a leadership gap rather than an execution gap, and it requires strategic architecture to solve, not more activity.
A preliminary diagnostic using the questions in this framework can be completed in one to two weeks with access to the right people and materials. A full audit, including competitive analysis, brand assessment, channel performance review, and vendor evaluation, typically takes three to four weeks. The audit is the foundation for any strategic recommendation, not a substitute for it.
The audit should produce a clear diagnosis of where the gaps are and a prioritized set of recommendations for closing them. The highest-priority gaps, typically in brand strategy foundation and business connection, should be addressed before any investment in execution capacity or agency changes. Fixing execution before fixing strategy produces better execution of the wrong things.
Both approaches have merit. An internal team will have context that an outside advisor lacks. An outside advisor will see patterns that internal teams have normalized. The most effective audits combine both: internal teams gather the materials and data, and an outside advisor brings the objective lens and the pattern recognition from working across multiple organizations. The questions in this framework are designed to work in both contexts.